Nettet17. okt. 2014 · Mosley, 238 U.S. 383 (1915) United States v. Mosley No. 180 Submitted October 17, 1913 Decided June 21, 1915 238 U.S. 383 ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Syllabus Section 19 of the Criminal Code, § 5508 Rev.Stat., punishing conspiracy to … NettetGet free access to the complete judgment in Hodges v. United States on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Hodges v. United States on CaseMine. Log …
Hodges v. United States on reach of 13th Amendment
NettetIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JAMES OBERGEFELL; JOHN ARTHUR; DAVID BRIAN MICHENER; ROBERT GRUNN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. LANCE D. HIMES, In his official capacity as the Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, Defendant-Appellant, CAMILLE JONES, Defendant. On Appeal … Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1 (1906), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court limiting the power of Congress to make laws under the Thirteenth Amendment. Three white men had been convicted in the Eastern Arkansas District Court for conspiring against black sawmill workers. … Se mer On 8 May 1903, Arkansas Attorney General William G. Whipple wrote to U.S. Attorney General Philander C. Knox to announce (and request funding for) investigation of a “white-capping” case. Whipple wrote that an … Se mer Pamela S. Karlan (law professor at Stanford) suggests in a 2005 law review that state prosecution of white-capping took place mostly for economic reasons—because intimidation of Black workers disrupted the operation of White-owned businesses. … Se mer Lawyers for Clampit, McKinney, and Hodges argued that the intended effect of the Thirteenth Amendment had been completed with emancipation and furthermore that no … Se mer Hodges has been cited as a significant moment in the limitation of Thirteenth Amendment powers and in the denial of civil rights to Southern Blacks. President Se mer • Text of Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1 (1906) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Se mer preetpal singh
Thoughts on Hodges V. United States - ResearchGate
Nettet9. mai 2024 · Hodges v. United States , 203 U.S. 1 (1906) is a U.S. Supreme Court case resulting in the overturning of the convictions of three white men convicted in 1903 of … NettetMLA citation style: Brewer, David Josiah, and Supreme Court Of The United States. U.S. Reports: Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1. 1905.Periodical. NettetAssuming arguendo that this constituted "excusable neglect," it does not extend the time for taking a direct appeal, United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 , 80 S.Ct. 282 , 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960); a fortiori it cannot expand the scope of relief grantable under Section 2255 into that available on direct appeal preetpal singh acp